There is a crisis of engagement. With 87% of employees disengaged worldwide, Gallup states in a 2016 report that “employee engagement has barely budged in years”. In the United States and Australia these figures are 68% and 76% respectively. These levels of disengagement represent billions of dollars in costs to organisations and governments.

Why are so many employees disengaged? How can organisations increase engagement? What effect do disengaged customers, students, welfare recipients and other stakeholders have on the bottom line and on organisational success? How can you find a superior means to overcome these engagement problems?

With a market in need of a viable solution, management has to address the symptoms, the foundations and find the solution, including a next generation of engagement tools.

Leaders MUST address the issues, the direct & indirect costs, the effect on customer experience, and the philosophies around minimising, and explore new & engaging methodology to deal with this problem.

MARKET STATUS QUO

Increasing employee engagement investments of 10% can increase profits by $2,400 per employee, per year. (Source: Workplace Research Foundation). Employers are rapidly catching on to the positive ROI of investing in their employee engagement efforts.

Highly engaged employees are 38% more likely to have above-average productivity. (Source: Workplace Research Foundation). This is a huge part of where we see increased profits coming from. Kevin Kruse (@Kruse) coined a great term to define this ripple effect that employee engagement tends to have on an organization, he calls it, “The Engagement Profit Chain”.

Companies that foster engaged brand ambassadors in their workforce report an average of 2.69 sick days taken annually per employee, compared to companies with weak engagement efforts, reporting an average of 6.19 sick days. (Source: Workplace Research Foundation). Sick days can be very costly in the way of lost productivity and reduced workplace morale. Reducing these costs is just another benefit associated with employee engagement efforts.

Companies with engaged employees, outperform those without by 202%. (Source: Dale Carnegie). “Employee engagement is the emotional commitment the employee has to the organization and its goals. This emotional commitment means engaged employees actually care about their work and their company. They don’t work just for a pay-cheque, or just for the next promotion, but work on behalf of the organization’s goals.” – Kevin Kruse

Companies that implement regular employee feedback have turnover rates that are 14.9% lower than for employees who receive no feedback. (Source: Gallup). This is a big one folks! There are a lot of estimates on the cost of employee turnover, and honestly, that number is going to be different for each employee, location and company. The exact number doesn’t matter as much as the prevention of that cost. What is employee turnover costing you?

Only about 25% of business leaders have an employee engagement strategy. (Source: Dale Carnegie). There’s another powerful statistic. The benefits of building an engaged workforce are undeniable, yet so many companies haven’t made the investment yet. This disconnect seems like the opportunity for a strong competitive advantage over the other 75% of companies who don’t have a strategy.

The numbers don’t lie, organizations are going to need to invest in employee engagement in order to stay competitive, drive productivity and improve the bottom line.

THE FIRST STEP

Leaders need to develop sincere, motivating, inspiring alignment of teams for many reasons… Remove silos, undo secret agenda, create unity of effort, inspire initiative, minimise mistakes, etc.

At Launch Engineering, we deal with this under the “8th “P” of Marketing, “Politics”… were we recognise that Internal Marketing is key to Marketing Strategy & Planning. Readers should contact Launch engineering or visit…

http://www.launchengineering.com/MissionVision.htm

 

 

Brand Equity Grows with Business Productivity from People

Engagement Levels Around the World

Advertisements

Product launches should never fail

Those who follow me, are aware that I ascertain new product launches should never fail.

Of course this follows from the fact that products don’t fail… businesses don’t fail… it is MANAGEMENT that fails to do its job properly, who truly fail.

How Do Executives Allow Product Launch Failures to Happen?

But is it their “fault”?

Perhaps modern-day executives are victims of the business education they have been fed, or the hype delivered by self-promoted NPD ‘experts’ who push flawed theory upon susceptible executives.

Models that are popular these days include the new product development wheel (which I admit to having taught, in the past, at postgraduate level myself) and the Stage Gate model (the NPD wheel re-packaged to seduce operational marketing folk with summarial simplicity)… BOTH limited and incomplete as management tools .

Given the limited delivery of academic acumen, it follows when Product Development teams are employed according to their knowledge of such tools, when business teams meet, committees are formed, and decisions are made they are made on the premise that these models are valid; its no wonder that product launches end up being risky, or unsuccessful.

Its kind of like a meeting of the the flat-earth society…. every decision that flows is built upon belief in a model that is simply flawed… so outcomes must be equally as flawed.

Methodology that starts with “idea generation” as Step One…. is dooming you to an 80% failure rate.

  • Idea Generation must FOLLOW discovery of market needs, wants, desires and aspirations.
  • Idea Generation must Be founded on Purpose, Mission and Vision.
  • Idea generation must contextual to the resources available to the organisation.
  • Idea Generation must to FOLLOW discovery of market needs, wants, desires and aspirations.

“That stifles creativity and innovation” cry the masses of self-proclaimed innovation & ideas experts (some of who are clever guys).

So might it be, but there ARE better ways paths to new product development for commercial success than the two mentioned above.

Anyone, globally, should bookmark & use http://www.prelaunchchecker.com to ‘test’ if your product launch idea has merit…

For folks in South East Asia, click this link to find out about my 2-day Product Development workshop this June in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. You can find out more by visiting, http://www.yf-asia.com/product-development-for-bullet-proof-product-launch/

Not only is this workshop is packed full of tools and knowledge for any executives who could use a brush up, training, or review of their Marketing Planning skills … Reviewing existing state-of-the-art Marketing Planning, but it ALSO also introduces new, evolving and breakthrough approaches to Marketing Planning that represent cutting-edge in Marketing science.

The course goes far beyond a revisit to a marketing planning template… embracing the issues around development and implementation ‘hurdles’ that all organisations face.

A leading FMCG executive described the my last workshop as, “One of the most insightful conference/trainings that I have attended for long time” and I’m hoping savvy executives will be equally as happy in the aftermath of attending “CREATING BREAKTHROUGH MARKETING PLANS THAT WORK!”.

If you are not at liberty to attend, why not tip-off anyone else who might be keen to do so? Click here for the PDF with more info http://j.mp/MkgPlnWS

An ‘early-bird’ discount expires at Xmas, so it might be best if you act right away…

SMART – its an acronym that’s been around for ages… taught academically, thought commercially, and simply just lacking!

Yes, it can be helpful, but sometimes SMART just doesn’t “cut it”.

So, what’s missing?

Having tested many approaches in many organisations as the Strategic Marketing level… my experience, somewhat enhanced by some Behavioural Theory, suggest SMART ignores the reality of the 5th & 8th “p’s” of Marketing (People and Politics) so I put together a little model and developed the acronym PEERSMART to ensure planning is built in such a bullet-proof way that strategic objectives CAN be fulfilled.

PEERSMARTHere it is: [see attachment]

Simply, if you make your Actions Politically acceptable, Ethical & responsible, Enjoyable and you dedicate adequate Resources, then SMART (Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Realistic and Time constrained) are likely to be implementable.

As always, I welcome criticism, thoughts, additions, qualifications and any other constructive comments that might benefit readers of this blog.

Some of my followers might recall that I lectured in Marketing Planning at UTS Graduate School of Business between 2003 and 2009.

Others might remember I have written Marketing Plans for national and international companies, many FMCG,  pharmaceutical and consumer durables, a plethora of other big, small & medium companies, both B2B and B2C.

I may have mentioned that I routinely travel to Asia to deliver commercial workshops on Marketing Planning to executives of large national and international companies.

Consequently, I have spent some time and effort to develop an approach to Marketing Planning that takes:

  1. the profit generating tools from academic Marketing Planning, and
  2. the commercial implementation and reality-checked truths of Marketing Planning in the business world,

… and merged and coordinated both, to put together a Marketing Planning workshop designed to help professional marketing and strategic planning executives write break-though, winning marketing plans.

I’m delivering this  richly empowering “how to” this coming February 17 and 18, in Sydney, so I’ve attached a link to a page where you can get a brochure and more info, and I’d be thrilled if you, others you think might benefit, or professional colleagues who could do with some finesse in Marketing Planning, could attend.

I trust that you will give this some serious thought and, if its not for you, pass it on to someone who you think could use the knowledge.

You’ll be able to download the brochure, find information and booking options at..
http://j.mp/KOmktgPlans

And please feel free to comment with your thoughts on the content, or any questions.

I wrote this book (see below) for different folks:

    • Business Leaders wanting to build an amazingly resilient business
    • Marketing Professionals
    • SEO Professionals
    • Management professionals
    • Wikipedia – who maintain a completely wrong definition of Marketing on their site but refuse to change it
    • People who think Wikipedia’s definition of Marketing is right

Download a FREE copy of my latest book – The Four Faces of Marketing http://bookboon.com/en/the-four-faces-of-marketing-ebook

Ideally, of all industries, TV SHOULD be one that embraces ‘marketing’ with a passion… not only to best understand their clients, but it SHOULD be their business to understand the element of PROMOTION, which they are key to supplying,12.5% to 25 % of the marketing mix, and, in B2C marketing, sometimes over 25% of total expenditure.

However, TV management has been systematically destroying itself by overtly breaching every possible concept within the arsenal of strategic marketing managers’ armaments.

Is it no wonder that Channel Ten (sometimes called the Simpsons repeat channel) can hardly raise a rating?

Is any EDUCATED business strategist surprised that Chanel Nine has turned, in panic, to mass retrenchments?

Is there damning evidence that ABC executives are actually surprised that ABC is finding itself higher placed in ratings than ever before?

What free to air TV management in Australia has done wrong is ample content for a three year full time marketing course – on “How not the embrace the knowledge and methods of proven strategic marketing management”.

This could NOT have come at a worse time for marketers, particularly FMCG marketers, who desperately need a spearhead promotional medium that can reach big grabs of population awareness in a single investment decision.

In the old days, when TV was content first and cost-cutting last, when imagination and creativity led content decisions instead of revenue grabs, “me-too-ism” and short-term snatchers of high profit, HUT (homes using Television) was at 98% and high ratings were challenging high 40’s.

Even the highest ratings now rarely enter the 30’s.

“Oh, it not TV executives” is the cry, “Its the Internet”. BULL! If TV executive shad embraced 1% of strategic marketing expertise they would have been able to undermine the Internet becoming a medium of choice for leisure time, and significantly reduce households from developing new habits, and from web sites seducing a reluctantly disenfranchised population. Even now, they could turn this enemy into an ally, if they gave countenance to marketing strategy.

What on earth justified undermining the cultural norm of Australians joining together for their 8:30pm Sunday movie? Who actually believes that relying on one quality content show will satisfy a remote-loving viewer for a week.

What purpose did de-regulation serve but the permit such offensive and disruptive proportions of advertising that people reached for their i-phones or lap tops for respite? What self-deceptive denial allowed TV management to allow this terminal policy to perpetuate?
Anyone with formal marketing training can easily see senior management of free to air TV has no understanding of consumer behaviour, rudimentary life-cycle theory, the Boston Matrix, or product portfolio management, of segmentation, of brand management, of targeting and positioning, of modified vs straight re-buy buying behaviour, of new product development, of trending, and certainly no idea of the concept of blue-ocean strategy.

So fatally and fanatically arrogant that they ‘know better’, the free to air TV industry will most likely be regarded in history as laughable as Ken Olson, president, chairman & founder-Digital Equipment Corp., 1977, who said… “There is no reason anyone would want a computer in their home”.

In theory, of course, FTA TV is saveable. But, in practice, it would take a ferociously focused and determined Board of Management, with the support of shareholders, cooperation of middle management and budget to match, to turn things around at this late stage.